Before discussing implementation details, most teams need to understand budget and scope. Here is a realistic use-case and pricing view.

What does it roughly cost?

What a sales transformation looks like in practice.

A concrete example of how operational sales friction gets turned into a structured system, and what a realistic engagement can look like.

Context

B2B team with 15-30 reps

Client data split across tools

Pipeline tracking is inconsistent

Problems

Follow-ups depend on memory

Handovers break between people

Reporting is manual and delayed

Managers lack real-time visibility

Approach

Map real sales workflow

Define CRM structure and ownership

Implement automations and routines

Train team on live scenarios

Outcomes

Clear pipeline visibility

Consistent follow-up behavior

Reduced admin time

Reliable management reporting

Indicative Pricing

Diagnostic & design: €2k-€5k

Implementation: €8k-€20k

Optional support: €1k-€3k/mo

Actual scope depends on team size, data quality, and current tooling maturity.

If the scope and budget feel right, this is how the work is delivered and embedded inside your team.

How do you work?

Simple structure. Practical delivery.

The goal is a setup your team can use and sustain in day-to-day work.

01

Understand reality

Review how the team actually works today, where information breaks down, and where effort gets wasted.

02

Design structure

Define the process, roles, system logic, and decision points needed to make the operation work cleanly.

03

Implement and embed

Put the solution into practice through tools, rituals, governance, and practical adoption support.

To keep projects focused and avoid low-fit engagements, we clarify who this is best suited for before the final call to action.

Who this is for

Teams that need clearer execution and coordination.

Sales teams moving beyond spreadsheets, delivery teams handling more cross-functional work, and organizations rebuilding operational flow in Microsoft 365.

Not a fit for

Teams that only need a one-off presentation and do not want implementation support.

Evidence from recent engagements

Anonymized examples from recent projects. Results vary by team maturity, tooling, and execution discipline.

Pipeline reporting reliability

Recent B2B team: weekly pipeline report prep dropped from ~4 hours to ~45 minutes within 6 weeks.

Follow-up consistency

Recent account team: overdue follow-ups reduced from ~30% to under 10% after CRM workflow redesign.

Implementation timeline

Typical rollout pattern: 1-2 weeks diagnose/design + 4-8 weeks implementation and adoption support.

Engagement clarity

  • Typical duration: 5-10 weeks, based on process complexity.
  • Who should attend: sales lead, one operations owner, and one decision-maker.
  • Internal effort: usually 2-4 hours/week for reviews, feedback, and adoption.

What happens on the first call

  • We map your current workflow and identify where friction appears first.
  • We clarify likely scope, timeline, and budget range for your case.
  • You leave with clear next-step options. No commitment required on the call.

How do I start?

Show me how your team works. I'll show you what's breaking.

A short diagnostic conversation with Frey Transformation Labs focused on your current workflow, where coordination breaks down, and where the biggest operational friction sits.

Book a 30-min call

Choose this for fastest alignment and a live diagnostic.

Email your situation

Choose this if you want to share context first. Typical response time: within 1 business day.